Get an idea of the usability and credibility attached to different domain
extensions.
| Type Of Extentions |
Usability |
Credibility |
| .com, .net, .org |
Reachable by 100% of the Web |
Maximum. Investors and speculators will
buy. |
| Country-level top domains
(.co.uk, .fr, .jp, .co.in etc.) |
Reachable by 100% of
the Web |
Excellent (those familiar
with domain naming will tend to associate the site at the domain with
the country in question and so expect e.g. a .jp site to be in Japanese)
Investors and speculators will buy. |
| "Disguised" country-level domains
(.to, .fm, .tv etc.) |
Reachable by 100% of the Web |
Good to fair. Some extensions are more
familiar than others (e.g. .tv is quite common, .nr is rare) Investors
and speculators will buy the VERY best names only. |
| Sub-domains (.uk.co,
.web.com, .soft.net etc.) |
Reachable by 100% of
the Web |
Fair. Many people not
used to this kind of domain name. Investors and speculators will NOT
buy. |
| Authorized alternative top-level domain
names (.name, .biz, .info etc.) |
Reachable by 100% of the Web |
Fair. Many people not used to this kind
of domain name. Investors and speculators will buy the VERY best names
only. |
| New.net names |
Reachable by a growing
%age of the Web population, but nowhere near 100% |
Fair. Many people not
used to this kind of domain name. Investors and speculators will NOT
buy. |
| "Alternative" domain names |
Reachable by practically nobody |
Near-zero. In principle, nobody should
be buying these names! |